Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : TechNVision Ventures Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 1287/Mum/2013
Date of Judgement/Order : 10/06/2015
Related Assessment Year : 2002-03
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Brief- Merely because the assessee had claimed the expenditure, where claim was not accepted or was not acceptable to the revenue, that by itself would not, attract the penalty under Section 271(1)(c).

Brief Facts of the Assessee:

The Assessee has claimed the exemption under section 10A of the Act Income Tax Act, 1961 (“The Act”). During assessment, the Assessing officer had excluded the income on account of foreign exchange fluctuation for computing eligible income for deduction u/s.10A.

The Assessee had claimed the expenditure of one unit against another unit which was not eligible for deduction u/s 10A of the Act amounting to Rs. 50 Lakhs. The total turnover of the assessee included STPI link charges received amounting to Rs. 8,03,258/-.

The Assessing officer however levied penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) of the Act and the same was confirmed by the CIT(A) on the plea that assessee has wrongly claimed expenditure of eligible unit against other unit.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

0 Comments

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031