Income Tax : A detailed overview of limitation periods prescribed under the Income-tax Act reveals how missing statutory deadlines can lead to ...
Income Tax : Understand Section 44AD of the Income Tax Act: presumptive business income, eligibility, turnover limits, and tax implications for...
Income Tax : Learn about Section 44AD, a simplified method to compute business income, excluding some entities. Thresholds and tax implications...
Income Tax : Sunset date for claiming Income Tax exemption for SEZs – Time to further extend the sunset date mentioned under Section 10AA...
Income Tax : Section 10A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act for short) deals with special provision in respect of newly established undertaki...
Income Tax : FM: Role of IT Sector is Crucial in Order to Promote E-Governance for Empowering Citizens; to Promote the Inclusive and Sustainabl...
Income Tax : Infosys Technologies Ltd. Tuesday said it will appeal against an order from the income tax department seeking more than 4 billion ...
Income Tax : Supreme Court held that Section 10A is a deduction provision, but the deduction must be allowed while computing the eligible under...
Income Tax : Transfer pricing principles dictate that a captive, risk-mitigated service provider could not be benchmarked against full-fledged,...
Corporate Law : NCLT Amaravati held that the corporate debtor's OTS proposals constituted acknowledgments of debt, giving rise to a fresh limitati...
Income Tax : The Karnataka High Court held that where the Revenue had consistently accepted the same interest rate in earlier and subsequent as...
Income Tax : The Tribunal held that delayed filing of Form 10-IC should not defeat the assessee's substantive right to opt for the concessional...
Income Tax : As per section 10A(4) of Income Tax Act, 1961, profits derived from export of articles or things or computer software shall be amo...
Income Tax : Circular No. 14/2014-Income Tax CBDT had issued Circular No.12/2014 dated 18th July, 2014 to clarify that mere transfer or re-dep...
Income Tax : Circular No. 12/2014-Income Tax Section 10AA of the Income-tax Act, 1961, inter-alia, provides for deduction in respect of the pr...
Income Tax : A clarificatory Circular No. 01/2013 dated 17.01.2013 was issued by CBDT to address various contentious issues leading to tax disp...
Income Tax : A clarificatory Circular No. 01/2013, dated 17-1-2013 (hereinafter referred to as 'Circular') was issued by CBDT to address variou...
Supreme Court held that Section 10A is a deduction provision, but the deduction must be allowed while computing the eligible undertaking’s gross total income under Chapter IV.
Transfer pricing principles dictate that a captive, risk-mitigated service provider could not be benchmarked against full-fledged, risk-bearing entrepreneurs, companies owning substantial intellectual property, or those generating revenue through software products.
NCLT Amaravati held that the corporate debtor’s OTS proposals constituted acknowledgments of debt, giving rise to a fresh limitation period. The Tribunal admitted the Section 7 petition after finding the debt and default established.
The Karnataka High Court held that where the Revenue had consistently accepted the same interest rate in earlier and subsequent assessment years, it could not adopt a different approach for a single year without justification. The appeal challenging the ITAT’s order was dismissed.
The Tribunal held that delayed filing of Form 10-IC should not defeat the assessee’s substantive right to opt for the concessional tax regime under Section 115BAA. Since the intention to avail the lower tax rate was evident from the records, the benefit was allowed.
A detailed overview of limitation periods prescribed under the Income-tax Act reveals how missing statutory deadlines can lead to penalties, loss of deductions, exemptions, and legal remedies. The key takeaway is that timely compliance with filing, assessment, appeal, audit, and tax payment obligations is crucial to avoid adverse tax consequences.
Where ITAT directed inclusion of Cepha Imaging Pvt. Ltd. as a comparable solely on the basis that it satisfied the export turnover filter without examining its functional comparability with assessee, and further directed inclusion of CG Vak Software & Exports Ltd.
The ITAT Delhi ruled that reimbursement of software costs to foreign AEs on a cost-to-cost basis could not be treated as a profit-generating intra-group service. The Tribunal deleted the transfer pricing adjustment after finding the benchmarking method adopted by the TPO unjustified.
The ITAT Kolkata held that delayed filing of Form No. 67 cannot deprive an assessee of Foreign Tax Credit under Section 90 and the India-UK DTAA. The Tribunal treated the delay as a procedural defect.
The issue was denial of deduction due to delayed filing of Form 56F. ITAT held that delay is a procedural lapse and directed allowance of deduction.
