Case Law Details

Case Name : Ashok Kumar Sureka Vs Assistant Commissioner (Calcutta High Court)
Appeal Number : WPA No. 11085 of 2021
Date of Judgement/Order : 01/03/2022
Related Assessment Year :

Ashok Kumar Sureka Vs Assistant Commissioner (Calcutta High Court)

Hon’ble Calcutta HC in a matter relating to imposition of tax and penalty under section 129 of the CGST Act 2017 on the ground of expiry of e-way bill, has quashed the orders and allowed refund of both tax and penalty paid subject to compliance of all legal formalities as there was no intention to evade tax by the petitioner and hence provisions of section 129 of the Act for imposing penalty equivalent to tax amount should not be invoked.


Heard learned advocates appearing for the parties.

In this writ petition, petitioner has challenged the impugned order of the appellate Commissioner dated March 18, 2021 confirming the original order dated September 11, 2019 passed by the adjudicating authority under section 129 of the West Bengal Goods and Services Act, 2017 for detention of the goods in question on the grounds that the e-way bill relating to the consignment in question had expired one day before, i.e. in the midnight of September 8, 2019, and that the goods was detained in the morning of September 9, 2019 on the grounds that the e-way bill has expired which is even less than one day and extension could not be made and petitioner submits that delay of few hours even less than a day of expiry of the validity of the tenure of the e-way bill was not deliberate and willful and was due to break down of the vehicle in question and there was no intention of any evasion of tax on the part of the petitioner.

No penalty for expiry of e-way bill if no intention to evade tax

The petitioner in support of his contention has relied on an unreported decision of the Supreme Court dated January 12, 2022 passed in Special Leave Appeal (C) No(s). 21132/2021 (Assistant Commissioner (ST) & Ors. v. M/s Satyam Shivam Papers Pvt. Limited & Anr.).

Learned advocate appearing for the respondent could not make out a case against the petitioner that the aforesaid violation was willful and deliberate or with a specific material that the intention of the petitioner was for evading tax.

Considering the submission of the parties and the facts and circumstances of the case, this writ petition being WPA No.11085 of 2021 is disposed of by setting aside the impugned order of the appellate authority dated March 18, 2021 as well as the order of the adjudicating authority dated September 11, 2019 and as a consequence, the petitioner will be entitled to get the refund of the penalty and tax paid on protest subject to compliance of all legal formalities.

Download Judgment/Order

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Join us on Whatsapp

taxguru on whatsapp GROUP LINK

Join us on Telegram

taxguru on telegram GROUP LINK

Download our App


More Under Income Tax

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Posts by Date

February 2024