This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Payment made for accreditation not covered by the definition of ‘royalty’ under Article 13(3) of India UK tax treaty
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Anchor Health and Beauty Care Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2004- 05
- Courts
- ITAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
ACIT Vs Anchor Health and Beauty Care Pvt Ltd (ITAT Mumbai)- Accreditation does not allow the accredited product to use, or have a right to use, a trademark, nor any information concerning industrial, commercial or scientific experience – or, for that purpose, use or right to use of anything falling in any other category of clause (a). An accreditation or approval by a reputed body may give certain comfort level to the end users of the product, and thus may constitute a USP (i.e. unique selling proposition) to that extent, but it may also be, therefore, used for the purpose...



