Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Payment made for accreditation not covered by the definition of ‘royalty’ under Article 13(3) of India UK tax treaty

Case Law Details

Case Name
Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Anchor Health and Beauty Care Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Mumbai)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2004- 05
Courts
ITAT Mumbai
Advertisement ACIT Vs Anchor Health and Beauty Care Pvt Ltd (ITAT Mumbai)- Accreditation does not allow the accredited product to use, or have a right to use, a trademark, nor any information concerning industrial, commercial or scientific experience – or, for that purpose, use or right to use of anything falling in any other category of clause (a). An accreditation or approval by a reputed body may give certain comfort level to the end users of the product, and thus may constitute a USP (i.e. unique selling proposition) to that extent, but it may also be, therefore, used for the purpose...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *