Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : M/s Beauty Tax Vs DCIT, ((ITAT Jaipur)
Related Assessment Year : 2007-08
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Advocate Akhilesh Kumar Sah Non-appearance of the supplier in absence of any other corroborate evidence cannot be sole basis to justify the stand of the Revenue that a transaction of purchase is bogus Additions to the income of an assessee while making assessment or reassessment treating purchases for the business as bogus one has remained common issue in many cases. Recently, in Beauty Tax (Earlier Florals India) vs. DCIT [ITA No.508/JP/2016, decided on 10.04.2017], a similar situation arose. Facts & Decision in Brief: During the course of assessment proceedings for A.Y 2008-09, the AO ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930