Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Pr. CIT Vs Smt. Hemlata S Shetty (Bombay High Court)
Appeal Number : Income Tax Appeal No. 1755 of 2016
Date of Judgement/Order : 05/03/2019
Related Assessment Year : 2006-07
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Pr. CIT Vs Smt. Hemlata S Shetty (Bombay High Court)

Amount received by a partner on his retirement and the partnership firm is not subjected to tax in the retiring partner’s hands in view of Section 45(4) of the Act. The liability, if any, to pay the tax is on the partnership firm in view of Section 45(4) of the Act. Besides, the duration of a person being a partner in the firm does not decide the applicability of Section 45(4) of the Act, as it is not so provided therein.

FULL TEXT OF THE HIGH COURT ORDER / JUDGMENT

1 This Appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act) challenges the order dated 01/12/2015  passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (“the Tribunal”  for short).   This Appeal relates to Assessment Year 21006­2007.

2 Although   multiple   questions   have   been   raised   in   the   memo   of appeal, the essence of these questions  is in the following question pressed by the Revenue :­

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031