Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Kalwa Bhasker, Vs ACIT (ITAT Hyderabad)
Appeal Number : I.T.A. Nos. 1365, 1366 & 1367/HYD/2015
Date of Judgement/Order : 26/05/2017
Related Assessment Year : 2008- 09, 2010- 11 & 2011- 12
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

 

In the present case, the assessee has disclosed all the particulars before completion of the assessment u/s 143(3), though the details were filed in the scrutiny proceeding. Further, scrutiny assessment proceedings have taken for AY 2011 -12, but, the assessee has disclosed all the details in respect of 2008-09, 2009-10 and 2010- 11 also. Therefore, the attempt made by the assessee to disclose the particulars of income shows the bonafides of assessee.

In the present case, the assessee has discharged the burden by giving detailed explanation before the AO. The AO simply rejected the explanation without discharging the burden cast upon him, as the assessee has disclosed the particulars of income in the scrutiny assessment.  In view of the same the case of the assessee is not a fit case to attract the provisions of section 271(1)(c) and accordingly, we direct the AO to delete the penalty imposed u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act.

Full Text of the ITAT Order is as follows:-

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031