This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Management charges paid to HO do not come within purview of section 44C
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Lloyd’s Register Quality Assurance Ltd. Vs Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax (ITAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2010-11
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Lloyd’s Register Quality Assurance Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Undisputed facts are, the Assessing Officer by treating the management charges as Head Office expenses has restricted the claim of the assessee to 5% of the total adjusted income in terms of section 44C of the Act. Whereas, learned Commissioner (Appeals) relying upon the order passed by him for assessment year 2008–09 and 2010–11, has restricted the disallowance under section 44C of the Act to 50% of the amount paid by the assessee. However, as could be seen from the facts on record, while deciding identical issue in case of a...
