Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Vimal Pukhraj Jain Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Vimal Pukhraj Jain Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) Multiple Notices in Short Span + Covid Hospitalisation = Reasonable Cause: ITAT Deletes Penalty u/s 272A(1)(d)- Penalty Cannot Be Mechanical: ITAT Mumbai Quashes ₹50,000 Levy Assessee filed an appeal before Tribunal against the order of CIT(A) wherein penalty of ₹50,000 levied u/s 272A(1)(d) was confirmed for alleged non-compliance to statutory notices. Assessee contended that delay in filing appeal of 807 days was due to genuine & bonafide reasons, as the accountant handling tax matters had left the job & new accountant later discovered that...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031