This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Mere issuance of scrutiny notice cannot stall the remittance of refund
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Ingenico International India Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (Delhi High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2018-19
- Courts
- All High Courts, Delhi High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Ingenico International India Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (Delhi High Court)
A plain reading of Section 241A shows that the mere issuance of the scrutiny notice under Section 143 (2) of the Act cannot stall the remittance of refund to the assessee. The refund can only be stalled if the conditions stipulated in Section 241A of the Act, to which we have made a reference above, are fulfilled, i.e., the A.O. records his reasons in writing as to why the release of refund is likely to affect the interests of the Revenue and that this step of the A.O. receives the imprimatur [which obviously would mean prior ap...




