Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : CIT Vs The Cuddalore District Central Co-operative Bank Ltd (Madras High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
CIT Vs The Cuddalore District Central Co-operative Bank Ltd (Madras High Court) The substantial question of law  framed by the Madras High Court was whether penalty u/s 271(1)(c) cannot be levied on the assessee, even though Assessee had claimed deductions u/s 36(1)(viia) among others which were not applicable to co-operative banks. Assessee, a co-operative bank, had claimed deductions u/s 36(1)(viia), among others. AO imposed a penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. CIT(A) deleted the penalty & the ITAT upheld the deletion.  Revenue appealed to the High C...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930