Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Rakeshkumar Shamalbhai Sharma Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Rakeshkumar Shamalbhai Sharma Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)

Conclusion: Matter regarding addition of Rs. 21.98 Lakhs as an unexplained deposit under section 69A was remanded back to the file of AO as assessee had not given the explanation as to why assessee did not appear before AO and file the details of source of the deposits within the stipulated time.

Held: Assessee filed his return for AY 2012-13 showing an income of Rs. 1,60,050/-. After processing the return under section 143(1), an e-notice under section 148 was issued. AO noticed a cash d

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31