Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : CIT Vs Ms Megha Dadoo (Himachal Pradesh High Courts at shimla)
Appeal Number : Income Tax (Appeal) No. 23 of 2011
Date of Judgement/Order : 17/03/2015
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
Brief of the Case

High Court held In the case of CIT vs. Ms Megha Dadoo that the product (Route Marker) produced by the assessee was commercially different from its raw material and also a commercially different product known in the market. The assessee was engaged in manufacturing of the said product. Therefore, the assessee was entitled to deduction claimed under Section 80IC of the Income tax act.

Facts of the Case

The ITO during assessment disallowed deduction under Section 80IC, claimed by the assessee. The assessee took the matter before the CIT (A) which affirmed the findings recorded by the ITO. Assessee preferred an appeal before the ITAT, which in turn reversed the findings recorded by the authorities below, holding the assessee to be entitled for deductions under Section 80IC.

The primary issue is as to whether manufacturing of “Route Markers” falls within the definition of “manufacture”, entitling him to the deductions, under Section 80IC of the Income Tax Act.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031