Case Law Details
Asterix Reinforced Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
We find merits in the arguments of the assessee for the reason that during transition period the provisions of any notification or circulars mandating the assessees to follow certain instructions should not be strictly applied. We further noticed that the assessee has filed its appeal in manual form and such appeal has been filed within the prescribed time under the Act. Therefore, we are of the considered view that merely because the assessee has not filed the appeal in electronic form, the assessee’s appeal cannot be dismissed on technical grounds that too during transition period. We, further, noticed that the Hon’ble Supreme Court and various High Courts have already categorically stated that when technicalities and substantial justice is pitted against each other, the substantial justice deserves to be prevailed over technicalities. Therefore, we are of the considered view that the Ld. CIT(A) was erred in dismissing the appeal filed by the assessee as not maintainable, hence, we set aside the issue to the file of the Ld. CIT(A) and direct him to admit the appeal filed by the assessee by directing the assessee to file its appeal in electronic format and also to condone delay in filing such appeal in electronic format.
FULL TEXT OF THE ITAT ORDER IS AS FOLLOWS:-
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of the Ld. CIT(A)-17, Mumbai dated 31.10.17 and it pertains to assessment year 2010-11. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal:
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
