Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Asstt. Commr. of Income Tax Vs. M/s. Afcons Pauling (India) Ltd. (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : I.T.A. No.3236/Mum/2010
Date of Judgement/Order : 18/04/2012
Related Assessment Year : 2004- 05
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

The assessee debited an amount of Rs. 17,34,716/- being foreign exchange loss that arose due to re-statement of current liabilities. The liability had arisen in the earlier years due to consultancy services rendered by Alfred Mcalphine, UK. The assessee contended that the loss arising due to fluctuation in foreign exchange liabilities, when such liabilities are re-instated as on 31st March, is ascertained liability and not contingent liability. The AO rejected the contention of the assessee. The CIT(A) followed the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT vs. Woodward Governor India (P) Ltd. (312 ITR 254) (SC) and held that the loss suffered by the assessee is allowable. We find no infirmity in the order of the ld. CIT(A) which is also in consonance with the principles laid down by the Special Bench of the Tribunal in the case of ONGC Ltd. vs. CIT (83 ITD 151) (Del) (SB). Hence, we uphold the finding of the first appellate authority and dismiss the sole ground of the Revenue.

INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL,MUMBAI

I.T.A. No. 3236/Mum/2010 – (A.Y. 2004- 05)

I.T.A.No. 2023/Mum/2010 – (A.Y. 2004- 05)

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

0 Comments

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031