Land cannot be held as an agricultural land in absence of agricultural operations

Jairam G Kimmane Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore)

In the present case, the claim of the Assessee that agricultural operations were carried out over the property and the property was actually used for agricultural purpose was sought to be established by relying on the classification of the property in revenue records. The Revenue contends that there is no evidence of the Assessee having carried out agricultural activities over the property. The Assessee has not established as to how agricultural activities were carried out and what e

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.