Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Nalinkant Shyamshanker Pandya Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Nalinkant Shyamshanker Pandya Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) Assessee did not file his return of income for AY 2012-13. AO had received an information that the assessee had made cash deposit of Rs.14,01,000/- in his bank a/c . In addition, there were non-cash deposits of Rs.3,39,450/- in the said bank a/c. On the basis of this information, AO  had recorded his reason u/s.147  &  notice u/s148  was issued but no return was filed in response to the notice . However,  Assessee had replied through e-mail to the SCN of AO  & given explanation regarding the cash deposits. AO  considered the ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930