Case Law Details
Case Name : Nalinkant Shyamshanker Pandya Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Ahmedabad
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Nalinkant Shyamshanker Pandya Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Assessee did not file his return of income for AY 2012-13. AO had received an information that the assessee had made cash deposit of Rs.14,01,000/- in his bank a/c . In addition, there were non-cash deposits of Rs.3,39,450/- in the said bank a/c. On the basis of this information, AO had recorded his reason u/s.147 & notice u/s148 was issued but no return was filed in response to the notice . However, Assessee had replied through e-mail to the SCN of AO & given explanation regarding the cash deposits. AO con
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.


