Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Nalinkant Shyamshanker Pandya Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Nalinkant Shyamshanker Pandya Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) Assessee did not file his return of income for AY 2012-13. AO had received an information that the assessee had made cash deposit of Rs.14,01,000/- in his bank a/c . In addition, there were non-cash deposits of Rs.3,39,450/- in the said bank a/c. On the basis of this information, AO  had recorded his reason u/s.147  &  notice u/s148  was issued but no return was filed in response to the notice . However,  Assessee had replied through e-mail to the SCN of AO  & given explanation regarding the cash deposits. AO  considered the ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031