Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

ITAT Upholds Addition for Property Investment Due to Insufficient Evidence Linking Withdrawals to Transaction

Case Law Details

Case Name
Kavita Samtani Vs DCIT (ITAT Jaipur)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2016-17
Advertisement
Kavita Samtani Vs DCIT (ITAT Jaipur) The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in Jaipur recently issued a ruling in the appeal filed by Smt. Kavita Samtani against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] for the assessment year 2016-17. This case underscores the issues surrounding undisclosed income and investments, as well as the handling of evidentiary documents discovered during search operations under the Income Tax Act, 1961. Background and Key Findings Smt. Kavita Samtani, the appellant, had her initial return assessed at Rs. 214,800, which was later revised under ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA Sandeep Kanoi
Qualification: CA in Job / Business
Company: Taxguru Consultancy
Location: Mumbai, Maharashtra
Articles Published: 17,295

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *