This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
ITAT Upholds Addition for Property Investment Due to Insufficient Evidence Linking Withdrawals to Transaction
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Kavita Samtani Vs DCIT (ITAT Jaipur)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2016-17
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Jaipur
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Kavita Samtani Vs DCIT (ITAT Jaipur)
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in Jaipur recently issued a ruling in the appeal filed by Smt. Kavita Samtani against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] for the assessment year 2016-17. This case underscores the issues surrounding undisclosed income and investments, as well as the handling of evidentiary documents discovered during search operations under the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Background and Key Findings
Smt. Kavita Samtani, the appellant, had her initial return assessed at Rs. 214,800, which was later revised under ...



