Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Vinay Kumar Dhingra (HUF) Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Vinay Kumar Dhingra (HUF) Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) Contention of Assessee:  1. The assessee fulfills all conditions specified u/s. 10(38) 2. Though the purchase of securities are off market, the sale of shares was made online on which STT has been duly paid. 3. The shares were held for approximately 18 to 20 months 4. Copy of d-mat statement, copy of contract notes evidencing payment of STT on sale of shares have been provided. 5. The assessee has proved the identity of the party, the genuineness of the transaction and the credit worthiness and therefore, section 68 is not applicable. ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930