Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Shree Balaji Samaj Vikas Samiti Vs CIT, Meerut (ITAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : ITA No: 94/Del/2012
Date of Judgement/Order : 15/03/2012
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

In the case of Commissioner of Income-tax vs. Multiplan India (P) Ltd.; 38 ITD 320 (Del), the appeal filed by the revenue before the Tribunal, which was fixed for hearing. But on the date of hearing nobody represented the revenue/appellant nor any communication for adjournment was received. There was no communication or information as to why the revenue chose to remain absent on that date. The Tribunal on the basis of inherent powers, treated the appeal filed by the revenue as un-admitted in view of the provisions of Rule 19 of the Appellate Tribunal Rules, 1963.  Respectfully following these decisions (supra), the appeal filed by the assesee is treated as unadmitted/dismissed for non persecution. We may like to clarify that subsequently if the assessee moves an appropriate application for recall of the order and explain the reasons for non appearance and if the Bench is so satisfied, the order may be recalled for the purpose of adjudication of the appeal.

INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI

ITA No: 94/Del/2012

Shree Balaji Samaj Vikas Samiti

Vs.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031