This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
ITAT allows proportionate expenses related to office-cum-residence used by ‘Farah Khan’
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- ACIT Vs Farah Khan (ITAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2013-14
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
ACIT Vs Farah Khan (ITAT Mumbai)
During the course of assessment proceedings, it transpired that the assessee owned 6 flats / units (A3501A, A3501B, A3501C, A3601A, A3601B & A3601C) on 35th & 36th floor of a Building namely Oberoi Sky Heights situated at Lokhandwala Complex, Andheri (West), Mumbai. All the units were stated to be used as office-cum-residence for the assessee. It was submitted that a specified part thereof was used by her as office and remaining part was used for the purpose of residence. For the specified part which was being used as office, the assess...
