Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Kapoor Industries Limited Vs CPC (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2024-25
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Kapoor Industries Limited Vs CPC (ITAT Delhi) Self-assessment tax is an “existing liability” under Section 132B; Seized cash can be adjusted toward it- Restriction under Explanation 2 applies only to advance tax, not to self-assessment tax. Assessee faced a tax demand of ₹3.74 crore raised by CPC, Bengaluru, during processing of return u/s 143(1) for A.Y. 2024–25. CPC had denied credit for ₹17.66 crore claimed as payment of self-assessment tax, representing cash seized u/s 132 during a search from the director’s locker. CIT(A) upheld CPC’s view, holding that seized cash cannot be...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reopening Fails on Both Counts: Invalid Sec 148A Notice and Time-Barred Sec 148 Render Assessment Void Coffee Income: Rule 7B Overrides Rule 7 – ITAT Remands for Segregation of Own vs Purchased Produce Duty Drawback Taxable Only on Receipt – ITAT Deletes Addition & U/s 270A Penalty Skill Development = “Education” – ITAT Allows Sec 11 Exemption to Charitable Trust No Penalty for Wrong Claim or Head of Income – ITAT Deletes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930