Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sanjeev Kumar Jain Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sanjeev Kumar Jain Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) Title 1: Demonetization Cash Addition Deleted: ITAT Accepts Audited Cash Balance for Business Deposits; Higher Tax Rate Inapplicable: ITAT Confirms Sec. 115BBE Cannot Apply to AY 2017-18 Delhi ITAT deleted ₹40.07 lakh added u/s 68 on cash deposits in the Assessee’s proprietary firms, holding that audited books showed sufficient cash balance & AO never doubted sales or purchases. However, regarding ₹7.5 lakh deposited in the personal HDFC account, Tribunal sustained ₹3.75 lakh for want of evidence. It also held that higher tax u/s 115BBE couldn...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 54F Deduction Allowed on Genuine House Purchase from In-Laws: Mumbai ITAT Pune ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148A(b) & 148A(d) Reasons Differed Section 54 Relief Can’t Be Denied Merely Due to Section 50C Addition: Pune ITAT Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition; Suspicion Can’t Replace Evidence Section 54F Exemption Allowed on Sale of Redeveloped Flat: ITAT Mumbai View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031