Case Law Details
Inderjeet Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Introduction: The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in Delhi took up the appeal of Inderjeet against the Income Tax Officer (ITO) on the matter of withdrawals and subsequent redeposits related to a property purchase deal that did not come to fruition. The central point of contention was the addition under section 69 of the Income Tax Act.
Analysis: The crux of the appeal was to determine the legitimacy of a hefty sum, specifically Rs. 2,90,00,000, which was added as unexplained by the lower authorities. The assessee contended that this addition was erroneous, and the deposit comprised a transfer from his grandfather’s bank account, withdrawal for a property purchase, and a redeposit when the property deal failed. Notably, the documentation and the transactional history played a pivotal role in the appeal. The bank statement of the assessee’s grandfather, the subsequent transfers, withdrawals by the assessee and his wife, and the re-depositing of funds were all scrutinized. With robust documentary evidence on hand, the Tribunal took reference from past judgments, which set precedence in similar matters.
Conclusion: Upon detailed analysis and understanding, ITAT Delhi came to the conclusion that the lower authorities, while making the addition under section 69 of the Act, did not take into account the evidences presented. The Tribunal thus ruled in favor of the assessee, directing the deletion of the entire addition. This decision underscores the importance of documentary evidence and the role it plays in establishing the credibility of financial transactions, ultimately leading to a verdict that deemed the initial addition as unjustified.
FULL TEXT OF THE ORDER OF ITAT DELHI
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
