Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Shri Jitendra Maganlal Shah (ITAT Ahemdabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2006-2007
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

The solitary grievance of the Revenue is that the learned CIT(A) has erred in deleting the addition of Rs.20,60,547/- made by the Assessing Officer on account of low G.P.

The brief facts of the case are that the assessee filed his return of income on 31.12.2006 declaring total income of Rs.1,46,69,340/-. In the case of assessee, a survey was conducted u/s 133A of the Income-tax Act on 11.11.2005 at the business premises of the assessee and during the course of the said survey proceedings, the assessee declared a sum of Rs.81,7

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31