Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Vasudhevan Muralidharan Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Vasudhevan Muralidharan Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai) ₹3.79 Cr Addition u/s 68 Remanded – ITAT Allows Assessee to Prove Sale of Agri Lands with Fresh Evidence The appeal concerned, an individual engaged in the bakery business, for AY 2018-19. The dispute arose from an addition of ₹3.79 crore u/s 68 made by AO, treating the capital introduced in Assessee’s books as unexplained cash credit. During scrutiny, AO noted that Assessee had introduced capital of ₹3.85 crore in his business. Assessee explained that the funds were sourced from the sale of two agricultural lands & two vacant plots. ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Tenancy Rights Transfer Taxable Only on Possession: STCG Addition Deleted JDA May Trigger Transfer- But No Double Taxation Allowed: Karnataka HC Relief CIT(A) Enhancement Quashed for No Notice – ITAT Restores LTCG Issues to AO No Penalty When Quantum Deleted: 270A Cannot Survive Without Addition Heavy Contract Payments by Trust Under Scanner: Matter Remanded for Verification View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930