Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : K. Paramasivan & Sons Vs DCIT (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
K. Paramasivan & Sons Vs DCIT (ITAT Chennai) Bad Debt or Business Loss? ITAT Chennai Says Both Apply When Fraud by Staff is Proved The case concerns a partnership firm engaged in dealership of BPCL petroleum products, for AY 2012-13. Assessee had claimed bad debts of ₹23.10 lakh u/s 36(1)(vii), representing amounts relating to HDFC Credit Card transactions & Petro Card Reloads which, according to Assessee, had become irrecoverable due to fraud by certain contract employees. AO, while completing assessment u/s 143(3), rejected the claim in full, observing that the alleged debts were n...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Interest on Delayed Sales Tax, Service Tax & PF Payments Deductible; TDS Interest Disallowed: Patna ITAT Section 54F Deduction Allowed on Genuine House Purchase from In-Laws: Mumbai ITAT Pune ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148A(b) & 148A(d) Reasons Differed Section 54 Relief Can’t Be Denied Merely Due to Section 50C Addition: Pune ITAT Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition; Suspicion Can’t Replace Evidence View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031