Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Arun Kudur Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-2016
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Arun Kudur Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) In the case of Arun Kudur, the Bangalore ITAT dealt with a best judgment assessment u/s 144 where income was taxed based on Form 26AS due to non-filing of return and non-compliance with notices. The assessee later claimed that Form 16 (available on departmental records) contained eligible deductions and exemptions such as Section 10 exemptions, Section 16(iii), 80C, 80TTA, and house property loss, which were not considered by the AO. The Revenue argued that deductions cannot be allowed without filing a return (Section 80AC(5)), but the Tribunal emphasized a k...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930