Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ramdas Pandharinath Kale (HUF) Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Ramdas Pandharinath Kale (HUF) Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) 

Assessee claimed deduction of Rs.80,85,572/- on account of re-investment in agricultural land. The AO allowed the same. The assessee filed additional evidences on other issue by way of a registered agreement dated 08-07-2016 on account of purchase of new house property in support of claim u/s. 54F of the Act. The CIT(A) having found the said information not before the AO, sought remand report. The AO furnished remand report. According to the AO relating to

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
April 2025
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930