Case Law Details
Case Name : Ramdas Pandharinath Kale (HUF) Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
Ramdas Pandharinath Kale (HUF) Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Assessee claimed deduction of Rs.80,85,572/- on account of re-investment in agricultural land. The AO allowed the same. The assessee filed additional evidences on other issue by way of a registered agreement dated 08-07-2016 on account of purchase of new house property in support of claim u/s. 54F of the Act. The CIT(A) having found the said information not before the AO, sought remand report. The AO furnished remand report. According to the AO relating to
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Sponsored
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.