Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ramdas Pandharinath Kale (HUF) Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Ramdas Pandharinath Kale (HUF) Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)  Assessee claimed deduction of Rs.80,85,572/- on account of re-investment in agricultural land. The AO allowed the same. The assessee filed additional evidences on other issue by way of a registered agreement dated 08-07-2016 on account of purchase of new house property in support of claim u/s. 54F of the Act. The CIT(A) having found the said information not before the AO, sought remand report. The AO furnished remand report. According to the AO relating to this issue u/s. 54B of the Act held that the assessee purchased agricultural land to an...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930