Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Harendra Mahendrabhai Patel Vs DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2020-21
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Harendra Mahendrabhai Patel Vs DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) AO had made an addition of ₹3,20,000 u/s 69A on the ground that foreign currency found during search was unexplained. CIT(A) confirmed the addition. Assessee explained that the small amount of foreign currency found at the premises of the assessee was left out currency out of the various foreign trips made by the assessee. Assessee & his family members had gone overseas trip in the year 2010, 2015, 2017 & 2018 & gave chart of the foreign trips of his father, his brother rakumar Patel & of the assessee. The children of the a...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930