Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Umar Daraj Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Umar Daraj Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)

Reassessment Quashed for Want of Proper Sanction: PCIT Approval Invalid u/s 151(2); ₹82.89 Crore Disallowance u/s 40A(3) Falls

Reassessment was initiated vide notice u/s 148 dated 30.03.2021 proposing disallowance of ₹82.89 crore u/s 40A(3) for alleged cash purchases of livestock, along with other issues. Tribunal held that since notice was issued prior to 01.04.2021 & more than four years had elapsed, sanction u/s 151(2)Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 153C Notice Issued After 01.04.2021 Held Invalid Tax Authorities Cannot Sit in Judgment Over Commercial Share Valuation Section 69A Addition on Seized Cash Notings Quashed Penalty Deleted Where Income Already Disclosed and Taxed Twice Section 271AAA Penalty Deleted Where Search Disclosure Was Proper View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
January 2026
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031