Sponsored
    Follow Us:
Sponsored

The tests to classify a particular expenditure as Capital or Revenue Expenditure as follows –

A. If the outgoing expenditure is so related to the carrying on or the conduct of the business that it may be regarded as an integral part of the profit- earning process the expenditure may be regarded as revenue expenditure.

B. If an asset or a right of a permanent character comes into existence due to incurring an expenditure, the possession of which is a condition of the carrying on of the business, then the expenditure may be regarded as capital expenditure.

Now the question is whether interior expenses done on the rental shop for the purpose of its smooth running of the business is a capital expenditure or revenue expenditure? Let’s answer this by following the above test –

1. The expenses were advantageous only for facilitating the business activities.

2. The nature of expenses included painting, plaster of Paris and the labour charges

3. No fixed assets or right of permanent character came into existence due to such expenditure

Hence, the expenses for Interior work in Rented Premises would be treated as revenue expenditure.

In case the lease agreement was executed for a long period of time, say 22 months or even more – can it be contended that the expenditures incurred on the renovation of the business premises will generate benefit to the assessee over a long period of time and hence it will be treated as a capital expenditure? There is no ambiguity that the assessee shall gain the benefit out of the interior expenses incurred by it. But the benefit is in the nature of smooth and efficient running of the business. As such the benefit to the assessee, though enduring in nature, but the same is not on capital transaction rather it directly relates to the revenue transaction of the assessee. Thus, the same i.e., interior expenses cannot be categorized as capital in nature.

Sponsored

Author Bio

Mr. Vivek Jalan is a Fellow Member of the Institute Of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) ; a qualified LL.M (Constitutional Law) and LL.B. He is the Chairman of The Core Group on Indirect Taxes of The CII- Economic Affairs and Taxation Committee (ER); He is the Chairman of The Fiscal Affairs Com View Full Profile

My Published Posts

IBC has overriding effect over provisions of Income Tax & GST Act Mere usage of name of Foreign AE not convert a transaction into international transaction Interest u/s 36(1)(iii) allowed as deduction even for purchase of Capital Asset PMLA Act and Maintenance of records become more stringent Where unexplained income cannot be entangled in clutches of Section 69 family View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
November 2024
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930