Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sameer Kishore Koticha Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 1826/Mum./2022
Date of Judgement/Order : 05/01/2023
Related Assessment Year : 2016–17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Sameer Kishore Koticha Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)

ITAT Mumbai held that entire interest paid on loan for acquiring commercial property is allowable as deduction. Restriction as provided in 2nd proviso to section 24(b) is not applicable. Hence, the amount of loss under the head ‘income from house property’, which is not set off against the income under the other head of income be allowed to be carried forward as per provisions of section 71B of the Act.

Facts-

The only grievance of the assessee is against denial of complete deduction of interest paid on the loan under section 24(b) of the Act and thereby not allowing carry forward of loss under the head ‘income from house property’.

Conclusion-

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

One Comment

  1. alaknanda says:

    The Income tax form automatically cap the dedcution amount to Rs. 2 lakh; how to claim deduction on the entire interest paid for commercial property

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031