Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Subramaniam Thanu (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16 & 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
DCIT Vs Subramaniam Thanu (ITAT Chennai) Section 271D penalty proceeding cannot be initiated if AO fail to record his satisfaction before initiating penalty penalty proceeding in respect of violation of provisions of section 269SS of Income Tax Act,  1961. Assessing Officer has to record his satisfaction before initiating penalty under section 271D of the Act in respect of violation of the provisions of section 269SS of the Act. In this case, the assessment order was passed on 30.12.2017 and reference was made by the Assessing Officer to the Addl. CIT on 14.03.2021 to initiate penalty proceed...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930