Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Shamji Kanji Zaru Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Shamji Kanji Zaru Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) For AYs 2015-16 to 2021-22, penalties of ₹20,000 per year were levied for alleged non-compliance with notices under sections 143(2)/142(1) in assessments completed ex-parte under section 153C read with section 144. Importantly, in all these years the Assessing Officer ultimately accepted the returned income and made no additions, resulting in nil tax demand (as reflected in the year-wise returned vs. assessed income table). The assessee explained that the e-mail ID registered on the tax portal belonged to a relative, who did not forward the notices; th...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Cash Withdrawn Earlier Cannot Become ‘Unexplained Cash’ on Re-Deposit: ITAT Bangalore SC Slams Casual Sanction of ₹8 Cr Loan After Borrower Defaults From Day One Inheritance Isn’t a Birthright When a Valid Will Exists: SC Interest on Bank Deposits Can Still Qualify for 80P Deduction- Bangalore ITAT Gives Relief to Credit Co-operative Society SC: Interest on Borrowed Funds Allowed Even for Investment Through Group Concerns – Commercial Expediency Prevails View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031