Case Law Details
Case Name : CIT (Large Tax Payer Unit), Mumbai vs. IDBI Ltd. (Bombay High Court)
Related Assessment Year : 1993-94
Courts :
All High Courts Bombay High Court
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Advocate Akhilesh Kumar Sah
Supply of Reasons Recorded for Making Reassessment is Necessary Otherwise the Income Escaping Assessment shall be Void
Introduction:
In GKN Driveshafts (India) Ltd. vs. ITO [(2003) 259 ITR 19 (SC)], it has been held that when a notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961(herein referred to as the ‘Act’) is issued, the proper course of action for the noticee is to file return and if he so desires, to seek reasons for issuing notices. The Assessing Officer(AO) is bound to furnish reasons within a reasonable time. On receipt of reasons, the noticee is ent...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

