Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Verambally Thazhikuniyil Vinodan Vs JCIT (ITAT Cochin)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Verambally Thazhikuniyil Vinodan Vs JCIT (ITAT Cochin) Ignorance of Law No Excuse- Cochin ITAT confirms Penalty u/s 271D for cash sale consideration; ITAT Cochin: Penalty for Accepting Cash Sale Consideration u/s 271D Upheld – No Relief for NRI Property Dealer Cochin ITAT dismissed the appeal of an assessee, a Non-Resident Indian engaged in property dealings, & upheld levy of penalty u/s 271D for violation of section 269SS by accepting huge cash consideration on sale of immovable property. Assessee was subjected to search & seizure operations on 10.02.2016 which revealed that he &am...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Pune ITAT: Housing Society Wins U/s 80P Deduction on Interest from Cooperative Banks No Double Taxation on Liability Write-Back: Delhi ITAT Deletes Section 41(1) Addition and Notional Interest Demand Copy-Paste Reasons Sink Reassessment: Delhi ITAT Quashes Reopening for Non-Application of Mind No 14A Disallowance Without Satisfaction, No Penalty on Debatable Issues Section 54 Relief Cannot Be Denied If Capital Gains Are Invested Before Filing Return u/s 139(4): Bangalore ITAT View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930