Sponsored
    Follow Us:
Sponsored

 Understand the intricacies of gold wastage in ornament creation and its tax implications in the case of P.R. Gold and Silver Craft v. DCIT. Delve into the Chennai Tribunal’s ruling on treating gold wastage as making charges and the applicability of TDS under Section 194C. Gain insights for your business.

Gold wastage during creation of ornaments can’t be treated as ‘making charges’; Sec. 194C TDS not applicable: P.R. Gold and Silver Craft v. DCIT – [2022] (Chennai – Trib.)

P.R. Gold and Silver Craft Vs DCIT (ITAT Chennai); ITA Nos. 1143 & 1144/CHNY/2018; 24/08/2022; 2013-14

Assessee was engaged in the business of making gold and silver jewellery. During the relevant year, assessee purchased old jewellery from the customers and the same was melted by the goldsmiths to get pure gold. During the process of making new ornaments, some gold suffered wastage which was retained by the goldsmiths. During the relevant year, the assessee claimed to have incurred wastages from 5%- 6%. However, the Assessing Officer restricted the wastage percentage to 1% and contended that the wastage over 1% was to be treated as making charges. AO held that the assessee failed to deduct tax under section 194C on these making charges and made disallowance under section 40(a)(ia). On appeal, the CIT(A) confirmed the action of AO. Aggrieved-assessee filed the instant appeal before the Tribunal.

The Tribunal held that the manufacturing of ornaments involves various processes and the wastage is actual and real. However, the given case didn’t pertain to the eligibility of wastage but pertained to whether such wastage was liable to deduction of tax under section 194C.  The entire process of the assessee was it had outsourced its manufacturing to certain jewellers outside Pondicherry and pathars in Pondicherry. The jewellers had not claimed any wastage as loss as they paid higher job charges which includes the value of wastage suffered. However, the pathars claimed wastage but paid lessor job charges. The assessee filed party-wise details of the making charges paid to jewellers and pathars and details of tax deducted therefrom. It should be noted that the provisions of section 194C are applicable when the assessee has paid or credited any charges covered thereunder. In case, no payment is debited or credited to the respective party’s account, then such payment cannot be considered within the ambit of section 194C or any other TDS provisions.  In the given case, the claim of wastage whether it is 1% or 6% neither involves any payment nor credit of such sum by way of cash, issue of cheque or draft nor by any other mode. Thus, the deduction of tax at source under section 194C doesn’t arise.

Sponsored

Author Bio

I am a Chartered Accountant in Practice from last 32 years. Any one who wants to discuss something related to Income Tax can mail me at [email protected] or call on 9810581427. View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Preparing for ITR Filing for Salaried Individuals: Key Precautions & Checks TDS on annual maintenance charges for maintenance of medical equipment No Section 69A addition where cash deposits reflected as sales & accepted by Revenue No assessment under section 153C in absence of incriminating material: SC Address to deliver Income Tax notice in case of person in judicial custody View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031