Case Law Details
Case Name : Pankil Garg Vs PCIT (ITAT Chandigarh)
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Chandigarh
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Pankil Garg Vs PCIT (ITAT Chandigarh)
Conclusion: Amount received by assessee from ‘HUF’, being its member, was a capital receipt in his hands and was not exigible to income tax as in case of individual, the HUF has not been included in the definition of relative in explanation to section 56(2) (vii) as it was not so required because in case of HUF, members of the HUF already find mention in the definition of ‘relative’ for the purpose of the said section.
Held: Assessment was framed u/s 143(3) accepting the returned income of assessee. Assessment was reopened u/s 147 only to examine t...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

