Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Pankil Garg Vs  PCIT (ITAT Chandigarh)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 773/CHD/2018
Date of Judgement/Order : 17/07/2019
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Pankil Garg Vs PCIT (ITAT Chandigarh)

Conclusion: Amount received by assessee from ‘HUF’, being its member, was a capital receipt in his hands and was not exigible to income tax as in case of individual, the HUF has not been included in the defin

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
November 2024
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930