Case Law Details
Jyoti Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Solitary issue involved therein relates to the addition by Assessing Officer and confirmed by the learned CIT(A) being provision towards contribution to Approved Superannuation Fund for the purpose of determining liability of the assessee on account of Fringe Benefit Tax.
FULL TEXT OF THE ORDER OF ITAT AHMEDABAD
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of learned Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals)-IV, Baroda (“CIT(A)” in short) dated 28.02.2014 and the solitary issue involved therein relates to the addition of Rs. 49,04,112/- made by the Assessing Officer and confirmed by the learned CIT(A) being provision towards contribution to Approved Superannuation Fund for the purpose of determining liability of the assessee on account of Fringe Benefit Tax.
2. The assessee, in the present case, is a company which is engaged in the business of manufacturing of engineering goods, resale & erection and contracts. The return of income together with Fringe Benefit was filed by the assessee for the year under consideration on 31.10.2007 declaring a total value of Fringe Benefit at Rs.40,66,296/-. In the assessment originally completed under Section 115WE(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (“the Act” in short) vide order dated 18.09.2009, the Assessing Officer determined the total value of Fringe Benefit at Rs.40,66,296/- as declared by the assessee in the return. Subsequently, the assessment was reopened by him after having noticed that the assessee had claimed expenditure of Rs.49,04,112/-on account of contribution to Approved Superannuation Fund which was not considered for determining the value of Fringe Benefit. He accordingly issued a show-cause notice to the assessee as to why an addition of Rs.49,04,112/- should not be made to the total value of Fringe Benefit. In reply, it was submitted by the assessee that even though a sum of Rs.49,04,112/- was debited to the Profit and Loss account on account of provision for Approved Superannuation Fund, the same was not paid over to the Life Insurance Corporation with whom a Trust was formed and recognized by the Commissioner of Income-tax. It was submitted that the provision made for superannuation fund was added back in the computation of total income by the assessee-company and there being no benefit extended to the employees on account of superannuation fund, there was no question of any amount which could be liable to Fringe Benefit Tax in the hands of the assessee. The Assessing Officer did not find this explanation offered by the assessee to be acceptable. According to him, the assessee would claim this expenditure as deduction in the subsequent year under Section 43B of the Act and the same would remain out of the purview of Fringe Benefit Tax. He held that the said expenditure thus was deemed to have been incurred by the assessee in the year under consideration and the same, therefore, was liable to be considered for determining Fringe Benefit Tax payable by the assessee for the year under consideration. He accordingly made an addition of Rs.49,04,112/- on account of provision for Superannuation Fund and determined the value of Fringe Benefit at Rs.89,70,408/- in the assessment completed under Section 115WG r.w.s. 115WE(3) of the Act vide an order dated 05.12.2011.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
