Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Piramal Enterprises Limited Vs Additional/joint/Deputy/Assistant CIT/ITO National e-Assessment Centre (Bombay High Court)
Appeal Number : Writ Petition (L) NO.11040 of 2021
Date of Judgement/Order : 31/07/2021
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Piramal Enterprises Limited Vs Additional/joint/Deputy/Assistant CIT/ITO National e-Assessment Centre (Bombay High Court)

The HC declared that assessment for AY 2017-18 made u/s 143(3)  vide order dated 22.4.2021 was non est u/s 144B(9) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for not adhering the procedure laid down u/s 144B(1) and u/s 144B(7/(vii) of the Act and holding that –

1. principles of natural justice firmly runs through fabric of section 144B(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 – para 63

2. Section 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961captioned ‘Faceless Assessment’ commences vide it’s sub-section (1) with non obstante clause and compulsively requires assessment u/ss 143(3) and 144 shall be by prescribed procedure contained under sub-section (1) of section  144B in the cases referred to in sub-section (2) thereof – para 64

3. Going by the provisions of section 144B, when hearing has been envisioned and incorporated, it is imperative to observe principle of natural as stipulated – para 66.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031