Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Gunjan Jaiswal Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Gunjan Jaiswal Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)

Accountant’s Email Caused Non-receipt of Notices – Delay of Over 1000 Days Condoned- Ex-parte Assessment & Penalty Set Aside

Assessee’s appeals before NFAC against the assessment u/s 147 r.w.s. 144/144B & penalty u/s 271(1)(c) were dismissed for delay of 1034 & 854 days. Assessee explained that both orders were passed ex-parte because the email ID in her PAN belonged to her Accountant, who failed to inform her or her tax consultant about the notices. She became aware only after

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Assessment Under Section 147/144 Struck Down for Not Issuing Section 143(2) Despite Valid Return Survey-Based 8% Estimation Cut to 4%: ITAT Ensures Parity With Parents’ Cases Temple Vazhipadu vs Demonetisation: ITAT Deletes SBN Addition of Rs. 1.45 Lakh Vivad se Vishwas Opt-Out Does Not Bar Tax Appeal: ITAT Decision Section 96 Overrides Income Tax for Post-2014 Land Acquisitions View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
December 2025
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031