Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Nagaraju Kesturkoppal Ramegowda Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Nagaraju Kesturkoppal Ramegowda Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) The assessee faced an ex-parte assessment under Section 144 where the AO treated entire bank deposits as unexplained income under Section 69A due to lack of response. The CIT(A) dismissed the appeal on grounds of massive delay (1969 days) without examining merits. The ITAT condoned the delay considering financial hardship, business closure, and lack of awareness, emphasizing that substantial justice must prevail. It observed that even in ex-parte cases, the AO is duty-bound to make a fair and scientific assessment, and cannot arbitrarily ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930