Case Law Details
Case Name : HDFC Bank Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2008-09
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Mumbai
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Brief of the Case
Sec. 14A – curative in nature, but the expenditure cannot be assumed as non apportionable
ITAT Mumbai held In the case of HDFC Bank Limited vs. DCIT that in case of composite business yielding two streams of income, taxable and tax-exempt, apportionment of the expenses of the business would be required to be made in terms of sec. 14A r/w r. 8D, which rule is mandatory. Not so doing would be to defeat and, rather, contrary to the clear mandate of section 14A.
Discount on issue of shares to employee under ESOP is an allowable expenditure u/s 37
Also the judgment of Biocon L...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

