Case Law Details
Ladderup Finance Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
ITAT Mumbai held that AO had only recorded general satisfaction but not with reference to the accounts of the assessee and hence has not satisfied the formula contained in rule 8D in order to compute disallowance u/s 14A of the Act.
Facts-
The case of the assessee was selected for scrutiny and after serving statutory notices and providing opportunity of hearing, assessment order u/s 143(3) of the I.T. Act was passed thereby making additions/disallowances u/s 14A r.w.r. 8D of the I.T. Act.
Aggrieved by the order of AO, assessee preferred appeal before Ld. CIT(A) and Ld. CIT(A) after considering the case of both the parties, partly allowed the appeal of the assessee by restricting the disallowance of Rs. 7,11,140/-. Now before us, the assessee has preferred the present appeal.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Author Bio
