Case Law Details

Case Name : ADIT, International Taxation Vs Express Drilling Systems LLC (ITAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : ITA no.751/Del/2013
Date of Judgement/Order : 09/01/2015
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All ITAT (6566) ITAT Delhi (1509)

Disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) shall not be made merely because TDS has been deducted u/s 194C instead of Section 194J

The provisions of section 40(a)(ia) of the Act has two limbs one is where, inter alia, assessee has to deduct tax and the second where after deducting tax, inter alia, the assessee has to pay into Government Account. There is nothing in the said section to treat, inter alia, the assessee as defaulter where there is a short fall in deduction.

With regard to the short fall, it cannot be  ssumed that there is a default as the deduction is not as required by or under the Act, but the facts is that this expression, ‘on which tax is deductible at source under Chapter XVII-B and such tax has not been deducted or, after deduction has not been paid on or before the due date specified in sub section(1) of section 139. This section 40(a)(ia) of the Act refers only to the duty to deduct tax and pay to government account. If there is any shortfall due to any difference of opinion as to the taxability of any item or the nature of payments falling under various TDS provisions, the assessee can be declared to be an assessee in default u/s 201 of the Act and no disallowance can be made by invoking the provisions of section 40(a)(ia) of the Act.

Download Judgment/Order


Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *