Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Boskalis Dredging India P. Ltd. (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : ITA No.6251 /Mum/2010
Date of Judgement/Order : 11/05/2012
Related Assessment Year : 2004-05
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Boskalis Dredging India P.Ltd, is a company incorporated in India on 5th January,1996. It is engaged in the business of undertaking inter alia capital and maintenance dredging projects and providing technical related services in dredging. However, during the relevant year, the income was earned from hire of personnel, hire of equipment and services rendered to group companies and not from dredging contracts. The assessee had leased dredger Gemini and Multicat Coby to associate enterprise, Boskalis International BV (‘BIBV’) since 1997, under the Standard Bareboat Charter Agreement.

Since the project for which the dredger was to be used did not materialized, therefore, the said contract for dredger Gemini was terminated w.e.f. 1st January, 2003 and the contract for dredger Multicat Coby was terminated w.e.f. 17th August, 2003. In the return of income, however, the assessee claimed depreciation on dredger Gemini and Multicat Coby for sum of Rs. 89,06,708/- and lay of cost of Rs. 21,86,686/-. The Assessing Officer observed that since the dredgers were not used for the purpose of business right from the assessment year 2003-2004, he, therefore, required the assessee to justify its claim for depreciation and lay up cost as allowable deduction. The assessee’s contention was that these assets were kept ready for use as it was looking for further contracts with other parties and the same should be treated as in passive use entitling for depreciation and allowance of lay cost. The Assessing Officer did not agree with the plea of the assessee and held that the assets were not used for the purpose of business during the relevant year and there is no profit earn from these assets which is assessable to tax in this year and accordingly disallowed the entire depreciation claimed at Rs. 89,06,708/- and expenses incurred on lay up cost for sum of Rs. 1,86,686/-. The detail reasoning for not accepting the assessee’s claim has been dealt with by the Assessing Officer at pages 6 to 10 of the assessment order.

INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI

ITA No.6251 /Mum/2010 – Assessment Year: 2005-2006

ITA No.7152 /Mum/2010 – Assessment Year: 2004-2005

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

0 Comments

  1. Ashok Asthana says:

    As per provisions of Income Tax Act, depreciation is allowed from the date “Put to us”
    Can somebody explain the above in light of the Supreme Court Judgement

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031