Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ACIT Vs Ramlal Jewellers Private Limited (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ACIT Vs Ramlal Jewellers Private Limited (ITAT Mumbai) ITAT Mumbai held that cash sales accepted and then deposit of said cash in bank account cannot be treated as deposits made out of any undisclosed income. Accordingly, addition under section 68 unsustainable. Facts- Assessee Company is engaged in jewellery business, selling jewellery items to its retail customers. The case was selected for scrutiny for cash deposits in bank. Based on inquiry, AO held that amount of Rs. 2,57,59,680/- is liable to be added u/s 68 due to unusual jump in cash sales immediately before the demonetization period. ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930