Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Deposit in bank not explained satisfactorily is unexplained credit U/s. 69A

Case Law Details

Case Name
Shri Parbat M. Chamriya Vs Income Tax Officer (ITAT Mumbai)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2009- 10
Advertisement
The assessee has failed to bring on record any evidence to establish his claims that the deposits in the ICICI Bank, saving bank account at Khar (W), Mumbai was out of receipts connected with his business transactions. In our view the assessee has failed to controvert the findings of the authorities below that he was not engaged in any business activity during the year under consideration. Therefore, in our considered opinion, the said unexplained deposits amounting to Rs. 27,10,812/-, the source of which has not been satisfactorily explained by the assessee, has been correctly treated as unex...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *