Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : PCIT Vs Agroha Fincap Ltd. (Delhi High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
PCIT Vs Agroha Fincap Ltd. (Delhi High Court) Delhi HC Upholds Reopening Based on ‘Yes, I Am Convinced’ Approval – Brief Satisfaction Note Held Valid u/s 151- ITAT Erred in Calling Approval Mechanical – Reopening Not Invalid for Brevity – Delhi HC Clarifies Standard for Section 151 Sanction In this case, the Delhi High Court examined whether an approval recorded as “Yes, I am convinced it is a fit case for reopening of assessment u/s 147 by issuing notice u/s 148” satisfies the requirement of valid sanction u/s 151. The Respondent, M/s Agroha Fincap Ltd., incorporated in 1995, ha...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 68 Additions Fail: Documentary Evidence Cannot Be Ignored Without Enquiry Commission Disallowance Remanded – 133(6) Non-Response Not Sufficient; Ad-hoc Expenses Cut to 10% Stamp Duty vs Actual Value Dispute: ITAT Orders DVO Valuation ITAT Bangalore Remands ₹49L Sec 68 Addition & ₹3.74L TDS Disallowance for Fresh Verification Penalty U/s 272A(1)(d) Deleted: Reasonable Cause Subsequent Compliance Accepted View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930